Mulch Love by Sean Swallow

February 29, 2012

in Articles, General Interest

Now here’s a little light relief, after all that Chelsea and farewells to the RHS.

My apologies though – I intended to give you a longer break but WordPress published this despite me. (or my incompetence)

Personally, it’s the weeds that keep me mulching… or absence of them..unlike Sean I hate weeding.

And coming in April and May on thinkingardens  - Andy Sturgeon and Thomas Hoblyn. But, just in case you thought our standards might be slipping now, we will also have a piece by Charles Hawes soon..

Anne Wareham, editor.

PS It seems Andy has over stretched himself so his (unsolicited) piece has been withdrawn….but don’t despair – instead you can look forward to the popular Alison Levey’s new piece (last one here) …….and… Charles Hawes…

Mulch 1 copyright Anne Wareham

Sean Swallow:

I’m going to assume that because you are reading this on a garden website that you know about mulch and its benefits to soil.  Almost everyone does these days, it seems to me, and even most non-gardeners have a vague idea; Mulch is muck put to purpose.  It ‘improves’ by being laid over soil in a thick layer, and then worms and rain pull it down into the soil.

On first hearing the word, ‘mulch’, I think it is normal to think it might be rude. This definition from the Online Etymology Dictionary sounds salacious:-

mulch (n.)

1650s, from M.E. molsh (adj.) “soft, moist” (early 15c.), from O.E. melsc, milisc “mellow, sweet” (cf. Du. mals “soft, ripe,” O.H.G. molawen “to become soft,” Ger. mollig “soft”), from PIE base *mel- “to rub, grind.” As a verb, attested from 1802. Related: Mulched; mulching.

And we make thick blankets with it in order to fertilise. Stop! I’m unsure how to pronounce the ‘u’; Some make it disappear, and others use the ‘u’ in ‘bull’. I prefer the latter because it makes it sound positively filthy.

I wonder if you assume, like I always have, that it is a good thing. I mean necessarily a good thing, and the very stuff of life.  I can think of several times when it is necessary; when importing inert and manufactured topsoil which needs to be made a home for worms; Or vegetable growing, when the plants make vast demands on the soils nutrients. I have been a madly lavish ‘mulcher’ in my time but, if there is decent topsoil already in a garden, I am beginning to wonder if I have always been right.

We have just completed a planting and have not used, nor do not intend to use, any mulch at all. It is not quite a first for us, and we have not mulched in a garden with dry and chalky soil and in a garden with wet and heavy soil.  Decent topsoil is all that was necessary for success.  So should mulching be the exception rather than the rule?

It does normally take some experience and training, but the simplest and easiest way to have happy plants is to understand the soil and the conditions, and then plant accordingly. When it comes to choosing plants the underlying principles do not change (so a damp loving plant will like damp anywhere). So if you describe to a botanist a meadow in England they will be able to give you a list of wild plants that are likely to be growing there (and a list of what will not).  The same is true of gardens. Tell a garden maker the specific conditions and the location and she will give you a list of plants that will be likely to succeed.

In my view what partly prevents this sensible approach is plantaholicism; the need to have the plant you want, whatever it takes, whatever the cost. Coupled with the dreadful expectation that any garden we see should have in it plants that we might not have seen before.  To fulfil this craving for ourselves (and the expectation of others) we mulch in order to create the greatest chance of survival for the widest range of plants.  Instead we could adopt a more scientific approach.

I would perfectly understand if this was a kind of rigour that you could do without, and love new and interesting plants too.  If we choose not to mulch we might have to let go of a few things. Last year I decided to hand back vegetable growing to farmers (I didn’t want to take away their business!), contempt of weeds (and personally I do like weeding),  of viewing ourselves as soil feeders and the annual pleasure of the chocolate brown blanket mulch.

Mulched copyright Anne Wareham

In return we might find something good. If we get over being plantaholics we might love plants by making them happy, rather than for just being new, and in doing so find a reason to become more thoughtful and long term gardeners.  If this is a kind of recovery from addiction should we then assure each other that it is ok to have a common plant, but wonderful to see it growing well, and so well chosen for that place.

And anyway gardens are for people, and whilst this garden is a lovely setting, I didn’t come to see the flowers, I came to see you.

Sean Swallow 

 www.seanswallow.com

Sean Swallow portrait copyright Sean Swallow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

naradesign.net May 19, 2013 at 12:25 am

Hi everyone, it’s my first visit at this web site, and paragraph is actually fruitful in support of me, keep up posting these types of articles.

Reply

Helen Gazeley September 20, 2012 at 11:22 am

But what about keeping the soil in good heart? If you don’t have a natural ecosystem where the fallen leaves and dead plants feed the soil, then you have to replace what’s been taken out. Commercial feeds do not supply humus; only bulky organic matter supplies humus. You could dig it in, but how much more efficient just to mulch the surface with compost etc and let the worms do the work.

Reply

annewareham September 20, 2012 at 11:24 am

Quite XXXX

Reply

John Kingdon March 7, 2012 at 9:24 pm

Oh dear! This isn’t “a garden website”, here you mustn’t actually garden, you must only think it. But this article is about gardening. And I like it, especially the last sentence which puts things into their proper context. Unless, that is, you merely want a garden to show off!

Purposes of mulching (ignoring potential of grass cutting as the article doesn’t relate to that):

Weed suppressant? Between my garden and the farm next door is some “no man’s land”. Soon it will be thick bee-friendly flowers – Himalayan Balsam! If I put 10 feet of mulch on the garden, the HB will root in it. Mulching does not prevent weeds, it merely covers them for a while. Like moss killer which only clobbers the symptom of a real problem for a while.

Retaining moisture? Unless the mulch is sopping wet it’ll draw moisture out of the soil below, not keep it in. Meanwhile we carefully plant that plant to the soil depth as in the pot. Then we smother it with 3-4 inches of whatever. Few ornamental plants are potatoes!

Decoration? I prefer close planting (which is also an effective weed suppressant) and if I’m waiting for perennials to grow, I’ll infill with annuals. Much more decorative and mulchicoloured (sorry Sean) in the spirit of Christo Lloyd (sorry Anne).

So at the end of it all, is mulch simply a cover for laziness – don’t bother to dig an entire area, just dig holes and plant, then cover with mulch. It’ll hide a mulchitude of sins (sorry again). Nah! Spread the stuff. Dig it in properly. Prepare the soil and then plant. Don’t leave it to the earthworms.

Reply

annewareham March 8, 2012 at 9:39 am

All right – I have learned my lesson, John. No more articles that even teeter on the brink of gardening, however entertaining…..

Reply

mike gerrard March 7, 2012 at 9:22 pm

Mulching makes me feel good. I’m not hurting anyone. why can’t I mulch if I want to?

Reply

Paul Steer March 5, 2012 at 6:05 pm

Thank God for that…its ok to have a common plant yeeeeha ! I have lots of common plants…but then I am common. Love the style of this article.

Reply

william martin February 29, 2012 at 9:29 am

When I hear the word mulch I reach for my Luger..or at least my Tim Richardson. Never before in the history of plant kind have so many been duped by so little.
Best Tundra

William Martin

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: